![]() Nonetheless, I had to spend a lot of time searching through the libraries to get the same functionality I had with the Python version. There have been significant improvements over the years here. We measured each metric ten times (on datasets that included all records and reduced to 1m records), and the average results are shown below under the heading, ‘Results.’īefore we look at the results, one aspect worth noting when I reproduced the Python code in JavaScript was the libraries’ immaturity. We measure the execution for the following sections in both programs: We used a broadly similar approach for Python with one exception : we used the time function from the time package. We carried out measurements for the JavaScript code by calculating the time difference between the Date.now() value at the beginning of a function and the end.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |